Back in the last century, I was invited to write an article for The Campus Minister journal on the future of campus ministry. I was too optimistic. In that article, I identified some of the changes that were coming in higher education, but I missed some of the religious trends that would impact denominational ministry with college students—theological divisions, the decline of congregational strength, the decreased denominational support this would bring to both campus ministry and theological education, and the rise of megachurches. One mistake I made was to project too far into the future out of ignorance of the rapid shifts coming in the latter part of the 20 th century. In the next several blog posts, I will attempt to consider possible future trends for the clergy leadership in the local congregation. I hope to avoid my past errors by looking at hard data about what is happening right now in the church and denominat...
In a recent call with a clergy group, I shared a survey from Exponential NEXT which found that 93.5% of church leaders used or explored using AI in 2025; 78% used it daily or weekly. One of the participants pointed out that if one uses the Internet, you are using AI whether you want to or not! It is probably true that everyone uses AI unintentionally! The finding of the survey, however, was that AI was intentionally used by most clergy leaders in the US. While AI can assist with sermon research, administrative drafting, and data applications, where do we draw the line to ensure that our teaching remains "God-breathed" and born of human experience, rather than just being an optimized synthesis of existing data? How do we safeguard the integrity of inspiration in our use of AI? How do we continue to nurture the human connection? Here are some tension points church leaders are currently navigating with AI: Authenticity. ...