I received my first
seminary degree 42 years ago this month.
There is much about that experience that I still treasure. I studied under some excellent professors,
made a number of friends that I encountered occasionally in my subsequent years
of ministry, acquired some basic knowledge about the Bible and ministry, and
learned to be a lifelong learner. In
reality, the last thing was the most enduring gift of my seminary education—I realized
that my education was just beginning.
There were some
things that were not so great. Rita and
I left family, friends, and ministry roles to relocate to another state. We moved furniture and belongings over 700
miles. She had to find a teaching job that would help support us during
seminary days (I got VA education benefits so I was not a total slacker). We had to locate a new church where we could
serve and be nurtured.
Only some years later
did I realize other shortcomings related to my theological education. Despite the fact that we moved several states
away from our home, the student body had little racial, ethnic, or cultural diversity. All of my professors (with the exception of a
female music professor) were white men.
For the most part, I was exposed to only one way of approaching the study
of the Bible. And everyone had to be a
certain type of Baptist.
Of course, times have
changed, but theological education has only recently started to move away from
the model that I experienced. Two years
ago, David Sebastian, dean of the School of Theology at Anderson University,
reported five trends shaping the future of theological education in North America:
1.
A
widening chasm between Christian churches and seminaries;
2.
Increasing
numbers of seminary students who have not grown up in the church;
3.
A
growing awareness that seminary education
is inaccessible for many potential seminary students;
4.
An
increased questioning of whether seminary is really worth the financial costs;
and
5. Forthcoming population shifts that will affect
the ability of seminaries to prepare culturally competent leaders for the 21st
century.
Sebastian is cited in a recent article in The Chronicle of Higher Education that reports some of the ways that
seminaries, divinity schools, and schools of theology are adapting to these
changes in church and culture. Although the
article does not cite Central Baptist Theological Seminary in Shawnee, Kansas, this
school has embraced some innovative and risky initiatives over the past seven
years to assure that it will not only survive but will serve the church more
effectively. In addition to developing
teaching sites in other states and ramping up online courses, the seminary has pursued
cross cultural programs. The most recent
is a program in Korean contextualized theological studies. Under the direction
of Dr. Rock Choi, this initiative is meeting the needs
of Korean students for affordable ministerial formation and training in the
context of their home communities and for whom study demands emphasis on the
Korean language.
We
can be grateful for institutions like Central that have recognized it is no
longer 1970 and our churches and culture demand new leaders trained in innovative
ways. Only those seminaries that
recognize and embrace these changes will survive and prosper.
Comments