When Alien came to the screen in
1979, moviegoers were confronted with the anti-Star Wars. The mood was dark, the spaceship Nostromo was an
unappealing wreck of a workhorse, the shocks were sudden and messy, and the
crew was expendable. Ridley Scott not
only launched a franchise of creepy films but he also put his stamp on science
fiction cinema. As with Blade Runner, his vision was unique
and disturbing.
In Prometheus, Scott
returns to the word of Alien but at an earlier time, one closer to our
own. The film is beautifully done with remarkable
sets, special effects, and cinematography.
The actors are capable but one never really engages with them, certainly
not like viewers did with Ripley (Sigourney Weaver) in Alien. There are many similarities between Alien and
Prometheus—a mysterious planet, an android with questionable motives, an evil
corporation, a heroine who endures more pain than anyone should have to
bear, working class crew members, and stomach churning creature effects. Perhaps the similarities are the reason that Prometheus
is far from fresh and ground-breaking.
We have seen all this before.
[Warning:
Spoilers ahead.] What’s good
about the film? Noomi Rapace is
attractive and earnest as Dr. Elizabeth Shaw.
She is a capable actor who is given little range for her talents in this
performance. We squirm at the suffering
she endures but finally come to the point that we no longer believe that a
person can endure all of this and still survive. Michael Fassbender is sufficiently creepy as
David, the android who patterns his impersonation of being human on the Peter O’Toole’s
performance in Lawrence of Arabia, but his role in the plot is so ambiguous
that it becomes a parody. Idris Elba is sufficiently
quirky and finally heroic as Captain Janek
but his final act of sacrifice seems almost trivial and anti-climatic. Yes, those are the good parts.
If there is any theological question raised here,
it is theodicy—the problem of human suffering.
Why would the Creator want to destroy those created? If God gave us life, why does God allow
pestilence, disaster, and humanity’s abuse of itself? Is this all an attack by the Creator on the created? Of course, Dr. Shaw is left with that
question at the end of the film. Will it
be resolved in the sequel (of course, there will be a sequel)? Probably, but I am not sure that I really
care. I will do my theology elsewhere.
Comments