“50,000 Life Coaches Can’t Be Wrong: Inside the industry that’s making therapy obsolete” is the cover story in the May 2014 issue of Harper’s
Magazine. Author Genevieve Smith actually
participated in a group going through several months of coach training in her
research for the article. She also
interviewed a number of coaches and prospective coaches. She gets some things right and others wrong.
Let me begin with the things with which I take
exception. First, Smith participated in
a program with Coach Training Institute, the organization that has trademarked
the “co-active coaching” model which emphasizes the collaboration between the
coach and the person being coached. This
is a very reputable program whose training is recognized by the International
Coach Federation, but its methodology is only one approach to coaching. Taken
to the extreme, the coaching model of CTI can seem humanistic and rather “new
age.” There are other approaches in
keeping with the ICF Code of Ethics and Core Competencies with a different
philosophical basis including those with a faith-based orientation.
Second, she quotes Robert Kegan of Harvard’s Graduate
School of Education as saying “men in particular have been attracted to therapy
in the guise of coaching.” ICF and all
reputable coaches make a clear distinction between therapy (counseling) and
coaching. Therapy looks backward to deal
with significant emotional and psychological issues. Coaching is present and future oriented and
designed for reasonably healthy individuals.
A professional coach never suggests that he or she is a therapist and
will make a referral to a competent professional to deal with counseling
issues. Life coaches are not attempting to take the place of therapists.
Third, Smith puts a significant emphasis on “monetizing
the operation” of being “a thoughtful listener, good friend, and confidante.” The last three terms do not really describe
the work of a professional life coach. A
coach is not just a listener but a questioner.
He or she is friendly but not a friend.
A friendship describes a give and take relationship; in a coaching conversation,
it is all about the person being coached. The coach is not seeking a relationship that
will benefit himself or herself personally.
Finally, the coach is more than a confidante. He or she is helping the
person being coached to do something with the information being disclosed.
Smith does a good job of providing the background and
history of coaching as well as the high standards of the International Coach
Federation. Although she makes some
effort to place the coaching phenomenon within the larger context of changes in
the nature of work and the shifting nature of the workforce, a longer
perspective will be needed to validate her observations which are (at best)
rather superficial.
(Thanks to my friend Tom Brown for sharing a copy of this
article with me.)
Comments
Best regards,
Patrick S. Smith