As some churches today find that they are no longer
sustainable, they seek alternatives for the future. One of these options is merging with another
church. This happened with my home church
in Mobile, Alabama, about three decades ago.
They found themselves unable to continue to minister in the neighborhood
where they were located and merged with another congregation that welcomed their
resources—both financial and personnel.
I have also seen the aftermath of several church mergers—both
successful and unsuccessful. I am not an
expert on church mergers but became involved in a text exchange this week with
a colleague on the subject.
As we texted back and forth on this, I reflected on the
mergers that I have observed and realized pretty quickly the key factor in a
successful merger. The key is, “Does
this merger have a clear mission?”
If the motivation is primarily survival, the possibility of
success is limited. The survival motive
is usually based on one of these ideas:
“If we can just get
an infusion of new blood, we can continue to do the things we have always been
doing.” This person is in denial. The value of blood transfusions doesn’t do
much for a body with a terminal disease.
“A merger will maximize our strengths and minimize our
weaknesses.” If both congregations are already
in decline, their result of their consolidation will probably produce one weak
church in the place of two weak churches (see terminal disease above) rather
than a strong church.
“Our problem is not mission but resources. Combining our resources will make us
stronger.” This is the idea of painting
over a crumbling wall. Assuming each
church already has a mission, then the mission of each is either wrongheaded or
inadequate. Unless both are willing to
throw out the goals they have pursuing and adopt entirely new ones, a
successful merger and a healthy church are unlikely.
There are church mergers between a strong church and a
weaker church, but most mergers are created from two churches on the edge of
survival. Each group must be willing to
be “born again” with a new mission and purpose if the outcome of the merger has
the possibility to thrive.
In the case of a stronger church and a weaker church
merging, the identity and culture of the stronger church will most likely
predominate because they are already doing something right. The challenge then becomes
assimilating the new people and helping them buy into the new culture. That is a topic for another day.
Comments