Theological
education continues to face challenges. Some are tied to finances, but there
are other factors as well—demographic, sociological, cultural, and
theological. As I work with the faculty
and staff at Central Baptist Theological Seminary, I am impressed by their
ability to turn challenges into opportunity.
They continue to develop creative ways to form students for ministry.
If a graduate
theological institution hopes to be viable in the 21st century, its
leaders must examine their paradigm, look at the context, and consider the next
steps in the formation of ministers.
What are some of those steps?
Distance
learning is one strategy that many institutions have already embraced. Most seminaries now offer portions of their
curriculum online or in satellite centers.
There are many ways of doing this, and the Association of Theological
Schools (the accrediting agency for graduate theological education) is blessing
this new approach.
Certainly,
theological education is becoming more contextual. Field education or ministry praxis that joins
classroom learning with “hands-on” ministry continues to be an important part
of a student’s seminary studies, but contextual education may also mean setting
up sites away from the seminary to offer courses or partnering with churches to
educate staff and laity within the context of the congregation. This is taking theological education to the
students rather than expecting students to come to the seminary.
Students are increasingly
involved in cross-cultural experiences on a long-term or short-term basis. Spending time outside their own culture
challenges ministry students to reexamine some of their presuppositions and
become more open to learning a servanthood approach to mission.
Even in
institutions with a strong denominational history, ministry preparation is much
more ecumenical than in the past. This
helps the school financially but it is also enriches the educational experience
of all students. This recognizes the rich
tradition of the Christian faith that is available to all believers.
There is also more
of an interest in cross-disciplinary studies in theological education. Although
this can take place more easily when the theological institution is connected
to a university, this cross-pollination can also take place in a free-standing
seminary among the theological disciplines or with the involvement of guest
lecturers.
Some
theological institutions see their future in interfaith education, developing
programs that provide ministry formation for students from the major world
religions—Judaism, Islam, and Buddhism, for example—as well as Christians. Here again, this provides a broader
educational experience for all students, but it may well be the most
controversial of the steps outlined here.
Whatever
happens in coming years, theological education is no longer static. It must evolve to respond to the mission of
preparing Christian leaders for a changing context.
Comments