Christians in the United States sometimes talk in rather
exaggerated terms of being “persecuted.”
What would life be like for us if we actually lived in a totalitarian
state without basic civil rights? The Man in the High Castle, an
alternative history series on Amazon, gives us some ideas.
The series is loosely based Philip K. Dick's classic award-winning
novel. In adapting the story for television,
creator Frank Spotniz has taken great liberties with the original source. Spotniz, who was associated with The X Files, freely exercises some of
the political and social satire of the former series in showing a United States
of America in 1960 where the Allies lost World War Two.
In this version of history, the United States has been divided
into three parts: the Japanese Pacific States in the west, the Greater
Nazi Reich in the east and the Rocky Mountain States (or the Neutral
Zone) in the middle. Hitler is still
alive, but he appears to be in failing health and ripe for assassination. In
showing us a history that never existed, Spotniz mixes the familiar and the
unexpected with styles, entertainment, and social mores displayed in disconcerting
ways.
The plot is driven by a set of films that depict an
alternate reality (or realities). These
appear to be historical newsreels but they depict things that did not happen in
the timeline where our characters live.
For example, one shows the Allies winning the war and crushing the Axis
powers. Another shows San Francisco being leveled by an atomic bomb and
American prisoners, including one of the key characters, being killed by
another key character. Are these films
faked or do they show another possible history or histories? The emphasis is less on how this is possible than
on what does it means for those in subjugation.
The films seem to represent the hope for a better life than the one our
characters live.
Both the representatives of the Reich and an American
resistance movement want the films and will go to great lengths to get
them. The Nazis see them as subversive. The goal of the resistance seems to be to get
them to the mysterious “man in the high castle,” but why he wants them is
unclear.
This is a rather slow paced and intricate presentation but
there is depth to the understated performances.
This gives special resonance when there is a truly emotional and
terrifying scene. The characters are so
deep that we cannot assume too much about any of them, thus surprising us at
times. We are never sure of their
motivations.
The science fiction element is minimal, surfacing primarily in
the final episode of season one. There
is more of an emphasis on the spiritual and metaphysical implications of the
situations on the lives of the principal players. What is reality and how does faith help us to
process it?
The key question of the series seems to be, “What are you
willing to give your life for?” Some of
the players seem willing to give their lives to obtain and protect these films.
Others are willing to sacrifice for family and loved ones. Even the Axis conquerors struggle with the
question in their own way.
We Christians talk a great deal about what is important to us,
but we rarely find ourselves in a situation where we have to take a stand and,
even when we do so, little is at risk. What is important enough for you to die
for? The
Man in the High Castle challenges us to answer that question.
Comments