Skip to main content

Let’s Do Away with Performance Reviews

Several years ago, I worked with an organization where we did annual performance reviews; at least, we did in our department.  Usually, I would do about half of these and my associate would do the other half, so I conducted about 15 reviews a year, usually around the person’s employment anniversary date.  Our approach to doing this evolved so that we tried to spend time not only reflecting on the employee’s work, but our role as supervisors and in planning for the coming year.




Even so, I am sure that these were stressful times for many, especially when we began the process.  One person shared with me several years later that he became sick to his stomach before his first performance review!  That is not a good sign.

In a recent article, Stephanie Vozza reflects on the “The Five Annual Review Mistakes You’re Probably Making.”  Vozze identifies:
  1.  Evaluating traits rather than behaviors and results.
  2. Being too lenient in your feedback.
  3. Waiting until the end of the year to give any feedback.
  4. Acting like a judge instead of a coach.
  5. Not being able to explain your rating process.

Vozza plays around with the of the idea of substituting “performance management” for “performance review,” but I would suggest that we talk in terms of coaching employees instead.  In the article, she cites Mary Anne Hyland, professor of human resource management at the Robert B. Willumstad School of Business as suggesting, “When providing feedback, it is helpful for a manager to think and act like a coach.”  How about applying this to the entire supervision process?

This would mean several things:
  • The supervisor would adopt the view that her or his purpose is to make the employee successful and, thus, forward the work of the organization.
  • The supervisor would meet with the person soon after employment to discover strengths the individual brings to the job, review the position description to set clear goals, determine where help is needed, and clarify accountability structures.
  • The supervisor would meet with the employee on a regular basis, no less than once a month, to review goals and progress and be available for “spot” coaching. 
  • In like manner, the supervisor would step up and provide immediate feedback if something is not going well and give the employee the opportunity to make adjustments.


The biggest challenges are that the supervisor must adopt a role as coach and not just manager and that the supervisor be willing to put the time into developing a coaching relationship with the employee.  The desired payoff would be a higher motivated employee, a more engaged supervisor, and a relationship of cooperation rather than fear.   






Comments

Check these out

Confessions of a Recovering Southern Baptist

I am grateful for my heritage as a Southern Baptist.  I was exposed to the Bible and worship from a very young age.  I grew up in a church in south Alabama that supported the Cooperative Program of missions giving.  This meant that our church had the benefit of being part of a supportive group of local churches and the educational opportunities that afforded. Our state convention provided varied and effective ministries with groups like orphans, ethnic groups, and college students.  We supported missionaries at home and abroad.  We had good Bible study and training literature (which we paid for, of course).  I went to an accredited seminary and paid a remarkably low tuition.  Wherever you went on a Sunday morning (in the Southeast and Southwest, at least), you could find a church that sang the familiar hymns and studied the same Bible lesson. In hindsight, I realize that this Southern Baptist utopia was imperfect.  There were significant theological differences, often geograp

The Bible Tells Me So

As I read the story of the Good Samaritan during my devotional today, I was reminded of the times that I have heard the story in the Christian education setting of the local church--as a youngster in primary and intermediate classes (old terminology), as a young adult in college classes, and then as an adult, often teaching the passage myself.     The characters and story line are very familiar due to these experiences of Christian education. These are challenging times for Christian education in the church.  Like so much of what is happening in the church today, the old forms do not seem to support present needs.  What once worked no longer seems to be effective.  Christian education or the formation of believers is in a state of flux. In an article on ethicsdaily.com , retired professor Colin Harris addresses this issue. He points out that the period of the 60’s and 70’s  “saw the beginnings of a loss of vitality within the educational dimension of church ministry, as the

Metaphors of the Kingdom of God

In a recent blog , consultant Seth Godin addresses the power of metaphor.   He points out, “The best way to learn a complex idea is to find it living inside something else you already understand.”   In other words, “this” is like “that.” “When you see a story, an example, a wonderment,” says Godin, “take a moment to look for the metaphor inside.”   Jesus turned this around.   In the use of parables, he told a story or provided a metaphor and challenged his hearers to see the truth within. For example, in his teaching on the Kingdom (or Reign) of God in Matthew’s Gospel, Jesus compares the Kingdom to such things as a mustard seed, yeast, a hidden treasure, a net, a king, and a landowner.   His hearers are encouraged to use their imaginations to understand something that they had never experienced.   He also attempted to shift their perspective so that they might see signs of the Kingdom breaking into their present reality.  These are metaphors for the Kingdom. Where do w

The Tragedy of Willow Creek Community Church

File photo of Steve Carter, Heather Larson, and Bill Hybels As Christian brothers and sisters, we need to pray for Willow Creek Community Church.   On the eve of the Global Leadership Summit, a worldwide conference sponsored by the church in cooperation with the Willow Creek Association, church leadership imploded as a result of further allegations against former pastor Bill Hybels. Last year, Hybels introduced the team who would assume church leadership upon his retirement--lead pastor Heather Larson and teaching pastor Steve Carter.  Although the founding pastor planned to stay on to assist in a time of transition, reports of sexual impropriety involving Hybels surfaced early this year.  He accelerated his departure from the church and left the board of the Willow Creek Association. When other charges emerged last week, teaching pastor Carter resigned. On Wednesday evening, Larson and the entire elder board--lay leaders who provide accountability on behalf of the congreg

A Future for the Global Leadership Summit?

Craig Groeschel, the founder and senior pastor of Life.Church. The Global Leadership Summit which began as a project of Willow Creek Community Church in South Barrington, Illinois, and its founding pastor, Bill Hybels, over 25 years ago was held this week without Hybels. For several years, the GLS has been now produced by the Willow Creek Association, a spin-off organization and a loose network of churches but Hybels has been its driving force. Attended by thousands at the church facility in South Barrington and broadcast to thousands more at satellite locations, the annual meeting brings together not only evangelical leaders but outstanding speakers from business, charitable organizations, politics, and business.  For the first time, Hybels did not appear due to allegations of sexual impropriety brought against him over the past year by former employees, staff members, and business associates.  He has already left the church and resigned from the board of the association.