A couple of months ago, I wrote a blog
on the challenge that a pastor faces in transitioning to leadership in a larger
congregation. This promoted a response
from a pastor friend in another state. I
share his comments with his permission:
“I tried to pastor a large church with a
medium-sized church style. It just about killed me. I resigned
before I did them serious damage. They still love me, but it was
extremely painful to face my ineffectiveness when I had done well in other
churches. I was a picture of ‘The Peter Principle’ of so long ago, i.e.,
promoted one too many times. However, I was at an age that I didn't feel
like I had the time or energy to change as dramatically as I needed to change,
so I returned to the kind of church where my gifts best fit, and left the
larger situations to those gifted for them. I guess I will spend the rest
of my life wondering if I should have tried harder to press my growing edge.”
Change is never easy, but I wonder if my friend has sold himself short. Perhaps if he had been able to receive the
right kind of support and encouragement, he could have built on his inherent
strengths and developed the skills necessary to minister in a larger
congregation. His comments do point out
the fact that various sized congregations have different needs and require specific
competencies of their pastoral leaders.
Over the next couple of months, I want to look at different size
congregations and reflect on the necessary competencies for a pastor to be
effective in each situation. By its very
nature, such a task is fraught with danger!
Each church is different, but my experience (and that of folks who are
much more competent in this matter than I am) points to the differing needs of
the family church, the pastoral or pastor-centered church, the program or
distributed leadership church, and the corporation church.
I look forward to this exercise. You
may not agree with my taxonomy or my observations, but your feedback would be
appreciated.
Comments