One Sunday my pastor preached on the passage in Luke 15 about the
loving father. Most of us call it the Parable of the Prodigal Son, but the
primary emphasis is on the action of the father and, by implication, the action
of the Heavenly Father.
The fresh insight I received that morning was that the father in the
story took the initiative in reconciliation with both sons. First, when the
younger son returned home, the father ran to meet the son without waiting for
the son to approach him. Second, when the older brother refused to come in to
the homecoming celebration, the father “went out and pleaded with him” (v. 28).
The loving father was not passive but active in sharing love and grace with his
sons.
This text can help us to understand better the nature and mission of
God as well as the nature and mission of the church. In the Hebrew Bible, we
read that it is God who takes the initiative to redeem humankind. God sends
messengers and prophets to inform and entreat the people of God to follow
faithfully. In the New Testament account, God sends a Son to humanity to share
the good news. God is a sending God. Therefore, the church should be a sending
church. If it is God’s intention to actively engage the world, then the church
in carrying out the mission of God (missio
Dei) must be a sending church.
This is the basis of a missional ecclesiology. “Ecclesiology” is
simply the theological term related to the study of the doctrine of the church.
“Missional” refers to the essential nature and vocation of the church as God’s
called and sent people. What’s the difference between “missions” and
“missional”? For many years, mission or missions was understood to be a program
of the congregation supported by financial offerings, prayer, organizations,
and projects. On the other hand, missional is a way of being and doing life (as
individuals, groups, and congregations) that asks, “What does God want us to
be, do, and become to continue the ministry of Christ within our own community
and global context?” rather than “What do we want to be, do, and become to
respond to our denominational programs or unexamined beliefs and traditions?”
In the missional congregation, mission refers to those initiatives
individuals, impromptu groups, and organized entities take to respond to
identified needs in the world, as a continuation of the mission of God. When a
congregation adopts this understanding, it will gain a new perspective and set
new priorities.
I believe that the adoption and practice of a missional ecclesiology
can have a greater impact on Christian witness in the 21st century
than the “emerging” or “emergent” church movement. In her book The Great Emergence[1], Phyllis
Tickle makes a good case that the emergent movement will have more impact
within denominations as it encourages Christians to learn about, honor, and
practice some of the rich traditions of other “tribes.” The emergent approach
might be seen more as a tool for dealing with the postmodern situation we find
ourselves in. On the other hand, a missional ecclesiology reframes the way we
see who we are and what we are about.
How are we carrying out the mission of God? God has reached out to
us and we, in turn, are to reach out to our world.
Some people seem to be a little tired of the term “missional
church” and dismiss it as just another phrase tossed around by those who are
unhappy with the way their church functions. This is a bit unfair. The idea
that the church does not have a
mission but is the mission of God in
this world is a transforming concept. My concern lies elsewhere with those who
assume that the only way to have a missional church is to disassemble the old
church and start from scratch.
Many of the most popular books on the missional church make
this assumption and provide numerous examples of those who have just left the
established church and started something new. Their approach is that “it’s
broke, so don’t waste your time trying to fix it.” There is a place for such
efforts, but I firmly believe that those of us who have cast our lot with the
traditional church can work within its systems to help it become more
missional.
(This blog post is adapted from material in For Such a Time as This: Aligning Church and Leadership for Missional Ministry by Ircel Harrison. The book is available on Amazon.)
Comments