I
rarely agree with columnist George Will about anything but, if what he states
is accurate, I have to share his concerns about a proposed monument in
Washington, D.C., for Dwight David Eisenhower, 34th president of the
United States. Eisenhower was President
when I was in grade school. My parents, lifelong
Democrats, thought so much of him that they joined many other Southerners in
voting for a Republican candidate for the first time in their lives in
1952. “Ike” was a bona fide war hero, a
country boy who rose to the rank of 5 star general and served as Supreme
Commander of Allied Forces in Europe in World War II and the first commander of
NATO.
Eisenhower
turned his military success and command experience to good use in the politics of
being President. Although some criticize
his failure to confront McCarthyism sooner and his tolerance of some corruption
in his administration, Eisenhower stood against military-industrial excess,
used the nation’s military power wisely, led the nation in great strides in
racial equality, and presided over a time of economic growth for the country.
According
to Will and other reporter, the proposed “memorial” harkens back to his days as
a “barefoot boy” in Kansas reflecting on his potential greatness. The monument fails to recognize the
accomplishments of the man. Will points
out that Philip Kennicott, cultural
critic of the Washington Post wrote that the memorial “ celebrates the ‘relatively small representation of Eisenhower’
because ‘there were other Eisenhowers right behind him, other men who could
have done what he did, who would have risen to the occasion if they had been
tapped.”” That’s just the point. They were not tapped, Eisenhower was. General George Marshall is reported to have
kept a notebook with a list of officers he was watching develop for over a
decade. It is a list of talented men who
served their country well, but Eisenhower was the one that Marshall and
President Roosevelt chose for the big job—the liberation of Europe.
On this Presidents Day, I agree with George Will
on this point: Eisenhower was either a
great man who deserves a worthy monument or he wasn’t. If he wasn’t, don’t add a tacky park to
downtown Washington. If he was one of
the best of his generation, then build something that celebrates that
greatness.
Comments