In a recent call with a clergy group, I shared a survey from Exponential NEXT which found that 93.5% of church leaders used or explored using AI in 2025; 78% used it daily or weekly. One of the participants pointed out that if one uses the Internet, you are using AI whether you want to or not! It is probably true that everyone uses AI unintentionally! The finding of the survey, however, was that AI was intentionally used by most clergy leaders in the US.
While AI can assist with sermon research, administrative drafting, and data applications, where do we draw the line to ensure that our teaching remains "God-breathed" and born of human experience, rather than just being an optimized synthesis of existing data? How do we safeguard the integrity of inspiration in our use of AI? How do we continue to nurture the human connection?
Here are some tension points church leaders are currently navigating with AI:
Authenticity. The risk is that congregants may lose trust if they feel a sermon or prayer was "manufactured" by a machine. The opportunity is that AI can handle the "heavy lifting" of research, giving leaders more time for face-to-face ministry.
I asked Google Gemini to write a sermon based on Matthew 25:31-46 with this format: three points with exegesis of the text, an illustration, and an application for each point. It was rather short, but the points selected provided insight into the text. I would never use the illustrations because I cannot imagine that they would connect with the life experience of the people where I would have an opportunity to preach. I also thought I could improve on the application. Now, maybe I didn’t ask the right questions or provide an adequate context, but this sermon was clearly not me and had not been informed by who I am as a minister of the Gospel.
Spiritual Growth. The risk is that reliance on AI for answers can lead to "cognitive atrophy," where we stop wrestling with scripture ourselves. The opportunity is that AI can create personalized Bible study plans or translate resources into multiple languages instantly.
I think there are possibilities here for AI as a learning tool. Online spiritual formation platforms such as Hallow, Ritual, BibleChat, and Examen already offer a programmed learning approach with scripture, videos, and questions for understanding and application. In the right hands, such platforms might become more interactive and attuned to user.
Relational Depth. The risk here is that AI can mimic empathy, potentially replacing the messy but necessary connection of a real faith community. The opportunity is that automated follow-up tools can ensure no first-time guest "falls through the cracks" due to human oversight.
By its very nature, human community—including the church—is messy. Much of the New Testament is devoted to guidance about living in community, confronting bad behavior, and living together in the Spirit of God. If God chose to be represented in human form, there is value in the human component of community.
There have been churches who rejected indoor plumbing, amplified sound systems, movie projectors and other innovations. However, I think most of us have found that indoor plumbing, air conditioning, quality audio visual equipment, copy machines, and telephones have made great contributions to our efforts to reach our communities for Christ.
Here are some questions to ask as you bring AI (or any innovation) to your church:
How have your people responded to change in the past?
Are you ready to be transparent about how you use the technology?
How will this help your ministry within your context?
Will the investment in such technology further your church’s overall mission?

Comments